Mitglied![]() |
'Umwelt'is only into 'in-der-Welt-sein'???,how can we mean that is...is & I intend to write a article on traditional distirict whose name is 'üsküdar'...Heidegger's 'umwelt' can be considered for 'üsküdar' I am not able solve,if 'umwelt' is likely ontic- environment, How is related with'in- der-welt-sein'? ....Thanks | ||
|
Mitglied |
Having in mind that Umwelt is the notion for relations with the things-in-use environment and other 's Dasein (all connected with a use-for-) we place it among the ontic-concepts. However, it is undoubtly depended on the previous analysis concerning in-der-Welt-Sein, because of what ontologically allows a Being to be connected with a usefull environment. Thus, the concept of in-der-Welt-Sein shows the direct dependense of Dasein from a world of things. I hope I gave you a clue, though I 'm not sure I understood the question. | |||
|
Mitglied![]() |
quote: Thanks young philosoher from Athens:-) Do you related 'Mitsein' (Being-with-others) and Umwelt? Jurgen Habermas in 1988;(into the preface of Heidegger et le Nazizme),Mitsein is problematique as itself, as it can not be arrive at the shpere of the intersubjetivity and other sosyolojical frame...Does anybody idea on''Umwelt& Mitsein''??? | |||
|
Mitglied |
Everything is related to almost anything in Sein und Zeit. So,Umwelt is connected with Mitsein in the fourth capital ![]() | |||
|
All posts, unless otherwise publishèd, are © their several authors.